Identity Referencing With '@' On Social Networks: Unexpected Outcomes

Recently I have taken to using blip.fm a lot, posting up songs that I enjoy so that the world (i.e. my social-networking sphere) may enjoy along with me. With disregard to your opinion on such behavior, this note describes a somewhat unusual outcome of this kind of activity.

What blip.fm offers you is the ability to cross-post your musical selections across social networking sites that you may indulge in. I am sure you have already seen such postings of mine, on Facebook and Twitter, featuring laudable performances by such acts as 'Boney M' or 'Lee Majors (The Unknown Stuntman)'.

Normally, this would not be remarkable. This is what the world is doing these days, after all, in terms of user-broadcasted content (in lieu of user-generated content). The unexpected outcome I experienced, however, formed as a result of two social networks that utilize the '@' symbol for identity references within their own messaging systems, and then begin interacting with each other.

What happened is this (real Twitter or blip.fm identities withheld for privacy): I 'blipped' a song on blip.fm, attaching the following note: "@thisgirlmyfriend 'that boy needs therapy!'" (the song here was 'Frontier Psychiatrist' by The Avalanches). My aim here was to reference the identity of this girl who is my friend, and a DJ, on blip.fm, so that my message ('that boy needs therapy!') would be delivered to her blip.fm account.

So far so good. But then remember, I also have blip.fm set to send out messages to my Facebook and Twitter accounts. Twitter uses the same identity referencing method ('@' symbol followed by username) within its own messaging system. So my message: "@thisgirlmyfriend 'that boy needs therapy!'" was also tweeted on Twitter. This would be okay if this girl who is my friend had an account on Twitter named 'thisgirlmyfriend'. Hell, it would even be fine if the account 'thisgirlmyfriend' didn't even exist on Twitter.

But the account does exist -- only, it belongs to a different girl who is not the same girl on blip.fm that is my friend. 'thisgirlmyfriend' on Twitter is a completely different person, who lives in Australia. I was surprised when I was sent a tweet from 'thisgirlmyfriend' (on Twitter) saying "hi! Saw the link you sent... frontier psychiatrist. Interesting =)", since as far as I knew, 'thisgirlmyfriend' was from the US.

Eventually, I caught on to what had happened (some people may have caught on earlier because of the different profile info, but my judgement was cataracted by my long exposure to social application development and the knowledge that online profiles are not necessarily always 'real').

Anyway, nothing really bad came out of this particular incident. 'thisgirlmyfriend' on Twitter (who was not the friend I had targeted my message at on blip.fm) fortunately liked the music, and is now my friend on Twitter. This turned out to be an unexpected, yet amicable incident.

In future posts, I will explore how this referencing of identity with '@' can have more serious implications when employed across social networks.

The Electronic Cigarette

-------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This information is provided for free, gratis, on an as-is basis, and is unasked for, completely unrequested. It is data that has entered your consciousness without either design or anticipation of your brain, and thus, even if the data is largely meaningless to your being, it probably validates several philosophical ideas on existence.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

My electronic cigarette is a device I received two days ago, pursuant to an online order I placed with Sottera, Inc of Scottsdale, Arizona on the previous week.

The device is comprised of three parts: 1) A battery fashioned after the look of the tobacco paper tube of a conventional tobacco cigarette, which is used in order to power 2) an atomizer, which acts upon 3) a nicotine cartridge also containing flavoring (tobacco, mint, apple, etc), water and propylene-glycol.

The atomizer is activated upon inhalation by a user in such fashion as commonly executed during consumption of a common tobacco cigarette. Nicotine from the cartridge (available in various mg denominations) is delivered to the user during this process, and a vapor mist is also created by the propylene-glycol, mimicking the sensation and effect of cigarette 'smoke'.

After two days of use, I find that it seems to be an effective replacement for the conventional cigarette. As the product does not contain tar, glue and other carcinogenic chemicals commonly found in regular tobacco products, it is generally much less harmful. Please note, however, that the electronic cigarette is not considered a smoking cessation aid, since nicotine delivery (not reduction) is its core function.

I am finding there are interesting aspects to switching to the electronic cigarette. These go beyond the usually advertised differences, such as the lack of cigarette smell, the clarity of my breathing organs, and such. They are deeper, more ... behavioral aspects which highlight things I did not notice before about smoking, and also provide small confusions to the self from time to time. Having communicated thus far the basic operational details and general information about the electronic cigarette, I will in the future explore these deeper aspects.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: End of transmission.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

games-pipe

playing around with yahoo! pipes

http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.info?_id=gHWiK7Xj3RGKuh5X_w6H4A

I win first post

Ha ha you suck